MAJOR SCANDAL IN F1 2025 SEASON
Formula 1 is experiencing one of the most controversial moments in its recent history after the close of the 2025 season. Lando Norris was proclaimed world champion, but his coronation did not bring unanimity or full recognition within the paddock.
As soon as the title was confirmed, an unexpected controversy began. Neither the team managers nor the drivers themselves chose Norris as Driver of the Year, unleashing a wave of debates, crossed criticisms and deep questions about the real value of the championship.
The case is even more striking because, statistically, Lando Norris met all the requirements of a legitimate champion. Key victories, extreme consistency and intelligent pressure management took him to the top of the world championship.
However, symbolic recognition never came. Within the paddock, many consider that Norris won the title without exercising absolute dominance, a perception that weighs enormously in a sport where sporting and psychological authority is everything.
The controversy intensified when it emerged that the majority of the Formula 1 environment continues to consider Max Verstappen as the true reference of the category. Although he did not win the title in 2025, his figure continues to be dominant.
For many engineers, team managers and drivers, Verstappen continues to represent the ultimate standard of competitiveness, controlled aggression and winning mentality. His influence transcends the results of a single season.
This contrast fueled a dangerous narrative for Norris. Champion in numbers, but not in collective perception, an extremely rare situation in the modern history of Formula 1.
From a media point of view, the scandal quickly exploded. Specialized portals, analysts and former drivers began to wonder if the 2025 championship was really a demonstration of superiority or a sum of favorable circumstances.
Some experts point out that the technical equality between teams, strategic sanctions and certain errors by direct rivals facilitated Norris’ path to the world title.
Others, however, argue that precisely in such a competitive context, perseverance and strategic intelligence are champion virtues. For them, Norris did exactly what was necessary to win.
However, the fact that he was not chosen as Pilot of the Year by his own colleagues hit his image hard. In Formula 1, respect between drivers is one of the clearest indicators of greatness.
Meanwhile, Max Verstappen continued to receive constant praise. His aggressive style, his absolute control of the race pace and his ability to extract more from the car continue to be admired even by his rivals.
Many within the paddock maintain that, all things being equal, Verstappen remains the most feared driver on the grid. That perception has weighed more than any points table.
This scenario raises an uncomfortable question for modern Formula 1: is it enough to win the championship or is it also necessary to command absolute respect to be considered a true champion?
The history of motorsport shows that the most remembered champions not only won titles, but also mentally dominated their rivals. That element seems to be missing from Norris, at least for now.
From a psychological point of view, this lack of recognition can become a double-edged sword. It can weaken the pilot’s confidence or, on the contrary, fuel devastating motivation for the future.
Some former champions have pointed out that this type of silent contempt often marks the birth of a more aggressive and dominant version of the driver in question.
However, there is also the risk that media pressure ends up affecting performance. In Formula 1, mental toughness is as important as pure speed.
The FIA ββand the F1 organization itself have avoided making an official statement on the controversy, aware that any statement could further fuel the controversy.
Fans, for their part, are deeply divided. While some defend Norris as a legitimate champion, others consider that the moral throne still belongs to Verstappen.
On social networks, the debate became explosive. Competing hashtags, comparative analyzes and endless discussions reflect a clear rift within the Formula 1 community.
This scandal also reopens the debate about the value of individual awards versus the world championship. For many, not being Driver of the Year reduces the symbolic weight of the title.
Looking ahead, the 2026 season is presented as an implicit revenge. Norris will have the opportunity to show that his championship was not a coincidence, but the beginning of an era.
On the other hand, Verstappen will seek to regain the title and reaffirm his absolute dominance, determined to close any pending debate about who is the true king of Formula 1.
In short, the 2025 season will be marked as one of the most controversial in recent history. A champion without consensus, an idol without a crown and a sport wrapped in tension that promises to continue.
Formula 1 now faces a crucial question: is the title or recognition worth more? The answer, like the debate, remains open and burns with the same intensity as the clue.
