The curling world was stunned when allegations surfaced regarding a critical mistake by Canadian skip Marc Kennedy during a high-stakes match against Great Britain. The incident, captured in dramatic detail, has now escalated with exclusive evidence released by the GB team captain. Seven photographs and three videos document what many are calling an undeniable error that altered the game’s outcome.
The controversy centers on an end in the later stages where Kennedy appeared to touch a stone illegally while sweeping. Under World Curling Federation rules, such contact can result in the stone being removed or the end replayed. GB claimed the violation was clear and should have cost Canada points.
The GB captain, a veteran of international competition, decided to go public after weeks of internal debate. He provided the media with a comprehensive package including timestamped images and slow-motion footage. The evidence package was shared exclusively to highlight transparency and fairness in the sport.
Image number one shows the stone in motion with Kennedy’s broom positioned unusually close. The second photograph, the most damning according to the captain, captures an unmistakable brush of fingers against the granite surface. Shadows and angles make the contact impossible to miss upon close inspection.
In the accompanying video clip one, the moment plays out in real time from the overhead camera. Kennedy’s sweep accelerates, and his hand appears to graze the stone’s side. Frame-by-frame analysis reveals a slight deflection that could have influenced the stone’s final resting position.
Video two zooms in from an end-line perspective, showing Kennedy’s reaction immediately after the apparent touch. His expression shifts subtly, a brief glance toward his teammates suggesting awareness. The clip runs for twelve seconds, looping the critical half-second repeatedly for emphasis.
The third video offers a wider angle from the broadcast feed. It includes audio of the British lead calling out “foul” almost instantly. The referee is seen turning toward the incident, though no immediate call was made on ice. Post-match review, the GB side argues, should have triggered action.
Image three captures the stone’s final position relative to the house. Measurements overlaid digitally indicate the touched stone ended up blocking a potential GB counter. Without the infraction, experts consulted by the team claim GB would have scored at least two points.
Further images four through seven provide contextual shots from multiple angles. One shows Kennedy’s glove position pre-contact, another post-contact. Lighting differences and stone rotation patterns support the claim of deliberate or accidental brushing that affected trajectory.
The GB captain emphasized that the evidence was not about personal animosity toward Kennedy. Instead, it aimed to uphold the integrity of curling, a sport long admired for its honesty and self-policing tradition. He noted that similar incidents had been penalized in past World Championships.
Kennedy, reached for comment through his team, declined to address the specifics pending official review. His representatives stated that all actions during the match complied with rules as interpreted on ice. They expressed confidence that any formal inquiry would clear the matter.
Curling analysts have weighed in heavily since the evidence dropped. Several retired skips reviewed the footage independently and agreed the contact appeared to violate Rule 8.3 regarding touching moving stones. Others cautioned against over-relying on video without referee corroboration from the time.
Social media erupted within hours of the release. Hashtags like #KennedyMistake and #CurlingGate trended globally among curling fans. Supporters of both teams traded heated arguments, with some calling for immediate point adjustments and others defending the on-ice decision as final.
The World Curling Federation confirmed receipt of the submitted evidence. A spokesperson said an independent review panel would examine the materials within the next ten days. Outcomes could range from no action to sanctions, replay of the end, or even match forfeiture in extreme cases.
GB players have remained measured in public statements. They stress the evidence speaks for itself and trust the governing body to act fairly. Privately, sources say the team feels vindicated after months of quiet frustration over the disputed result.
Kennedy’s teammates have rallied around him online. Posts from fellow Canadian curlers highlight his sportsmanship throughout a long career. They argue that split-second incidents should not overshadow decades of dedication and clean play at the highest levels.
The affected match was part of a major international bonspiel with significant ranking implications. Canada ultimately won by a narrow margin, securing crucial points toward Olympic qualification. A reversal now would reshape standings and potentially alter seeding for upcoming events.
Fans worldwide have called for greater use of technology in curling. Instant replay challenges, similar to those in tennis or football, could prevent future controversies. Proponents point to this case as proof that human eyes alone sometimes miss critical details.
As the review process begins, the curling community holds its breath. The seven images and three videos have transformed a routine debate into a landmark moment for the sport’s governance. Whatever the outcome, the conversation about fairness and accountability will linger long after the ice melts.
In the end, this episode underscores curling’s unique blend of tradition and precision. One fleeting touch, captured forever in pixels, now challenges everyone involved to uphold the highest standards. The truth, as revealed through exclusive evidence, may yet rewrite a chapter in the record books.
