OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT 🚨 Australian tennis star Alex de Minaur has confirmed that he will not be wearing the LGBT rainbow symbol at the upcoming major tournament. Explaining his decision, Alex said: “Sport should focus on what happens in the competition — technique, performance and results — not on political or social movements.” Immediately, Anthony Albanese reacted fiercely, calling the decision “a serious step backward for Australian inclusion and values,” and threatening to take “necessary” measures to protect the nation’s image at its home tournament!

This story is shocking the entire world tennis community, especially when the 2026 Australian Open – the first Grand Slam tournament of the year – is preparing to start in just a few days. As Australia’s No. 1 tennis player and one of the top ATP stars, Alex de Minaur is always expected not only in terms of his performance but also in his role as a representative of national values.

The decision not to wear the rainbow symbol – which often appears as armbands, shirt badges or decorative elements on the field – has sharply divided public opinion, from enthusiastic support to harsh criticism.

According to information widely spread on social networks and some news sites, de Minaur made an official statement during a brief press conference at Melbourne Park. He emphasized that sports should remain neutral, focusing on skills and results rather than being a platform for social movements.

“I respect all individuals and communities, but on the field I want all the attention to be on the ball, not political symbols,” de Minaur was quoted as saying.

This explanation quickly became the focus of debate, especially since the Australian Open has long been famous for its special anniversaries, of which Pride Day is the biggest event, held annually since 2019 and this year falls on January 30 – right before the final weekend.

Pride Day at AO is more than just a day of rainbow-colored celebration: the stadium is decorated with Pride flags, glitter makeup stations, drag queen performances, live music, and activities that connect the LGBTQIA+ community. The Australian Open proudly calls this “the largest LGBTQIA+ tour” in the Grand Slam system, with the participation of top artists and a strong message of inclusion.

The fact that a home tennis player like de Minaur – who is often invited to special events – refused to wear the logo has surprised and disappointed many people.

The reaction from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese came quickly and strongly. In a statement posted on his official account, Mr Albanese called the decision “a serious step backwards for inclusion and core Australian values”. He emphasized that Australia is a leader in equal rights, and the Australian Open – the country’s biggest sporting event – ​​must reflect that.

“We cannot let the image of the country be affected by personal choices that go against the spirit of solidarity,” Albanese said, hinting that the government may consider “necessary measures” to protect national values ​​at the home tournament.

While it is unclear what the specific “measures” are – they could range from public calls to pressure on organizers or even supportive policies – the threat has raised concerns about political interference in sports.

The social network community exploded immediately. One side supports de Minaur, saying he is defending the purity of the sport: “Tennis is about forehand, backhand, not politics!” or “De Minaur is not a politician, he is an athlete!”. Many fans argue that forcing the wearing of the symbol could violate personal freedom and reduce focus on competition.

On the other hand, LGBTQIA+ activists and fans criticized de Minaur for “lack of social responsibility”, especially when he is a symbol of Australia – a country proud of its diversity. “As Australia’s No. 1, he should lead by example of inclusion, not avoidance,” one popular comment read. Some even called for a boycott if de Minaur did not change his stance.

In fact, this is not the first time Pride symbols have caused controversy in Australian sports. From the incident of NBL players refusing to wear Pride jerseys in 2023, to debates in rugby and cricket, this topic has always been sensitive. However, with the Australian Open – where Pride Day has become a major tradition – de Minaur’s decision could set a precedent.

The AO organizers have not officially commented, but internal sources said they are closely monitoring and may have their own statement to emphasize their commitment to the community.

In terms of his career, de Minaur is at his peak. With high rankings and stable achievements, he is expected to advance deeply at AO 2026, even competing for the championship if top players like Sinner or Alcaraz have problems. But this storm of public opinion can affect the psychology of competition. Many experts believe that pressure from politicians, media and fans can distract him, especially when Pride Day takes place in the middle of the tournament.

This story also raises a larger question: What are the limits of inclusion in sports? Do athletes have the right to remain personally neutral, or do they have to become social symbols when representing their country? With the threat from Albanese, many people worry that if the government intervenes too deeply, Australian sports could be politicized, affecting its international image.

Currently, the entire tennis world is waiting with bated breath to see how de Minaur will handle it. Will he stand firm, or will there be concessions under pressure? Australian Open 2026 is not only a battle on the field, but also a battle of values, freedom and inclusion. And Alex de Minaur, whether he liked it or not, became its center.