Meghan Markle Claims the Royal Family “Plotted” Against Her — Sparking Fresh Public Anger

In the latest chapter of one of the most enduring sagas in modern British royalty, Meghan Markle has once again thrust herself into the spotlight with explosive allegations that the royal family orchestrated a deliberate campaign against her.

Sources close to the Duchess of Sussex suggest she believes a “coordinated effort” by palace insiders has been working to undermine her career, sabotage her business ventures, and tarnish her reputation ever since she and Prince Harry stepped back from senior royal duties in 2020.

These fresh claims have ignited a wave of public fury in the United Kingdom, where many view them as yet another provocative attack on an institution that remains a cherished symbol of national identity.

The accusations emerge at a time when the Sussexes’ relationship with the royal family appears more strained than ever. Reports indicate Meghan is convinced that powerful figures within the monarchy have influenced media narratives, pressured corporate partners, and even interfered with her high-profile Netflix deals.

One insider described her as feeling “targeted” by what she perceives as a shadowy network determined to prevent her from succeeding outside the royal fold.

While no concrete evidence has been publicly presented to substantiate these specific claims, they echo longstanding grievances aired by the couple in their 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview, the Netflix docuseries “Harry & Meghan,” and Prince Harry’s memoir Spare.

Public reaction in Britain has been swift and largely unforgiving. Social media platforms and tabloid comment sections have overflowed with criticism, with many accusing Meghan of perpetuating division for personal gain. “She’s been gone for years, yet still blaming everyone but herself,” one commenter wrote on a popular royal forum.

Others pointed to the timing of the allegations, noting that they coincide with renewed speculation about a potential Sussex return to the UK—perhaps tied to upcoming Invictus Games events or security arrangements for Prince Harry.

Several commentators have suggested the claims are a preemptive strike designed to shift blame amid growing reports of professional setbacks, including staff turnover at Archewell and questions over the couple’s media projects.

The royal family itself has remained characteristically silent on the matter, consistent with its long-standing policy of not commenting on private family disputes.

However, palace sources have privately expressed frustration at what they see as recycled narratives that continue to distract from the monarchy’s current priorities, including King Charles III’s ongoing health challenges and the steady work of the Prince and Princess of Wales in supporting public causes.

For many observers, the absence of any official response speaks volumes; the institution appears determined not to engage in a public tit-for-tat that could further erode its dignity.

This latest controversy revives memories of earlier bombshells that rocked the monarchy. During the Oprah interview, Meghan spoke of feeling “silenced” and hinted at concerns within the family about her son’s skin color. In the Netflix series, the couple portrayed a world of rigid protocols, media manipulation, and emotional isolation.

Prince Harry’s book went even further, detailing perceived slights from his brother and father. Supporters of the Sussexes argue these revelations exposed genuine institutional racism and a lack of support for a biracial American entering one of the world’s most traditional families.

Critics, however, contend that the constant airing of grievances has become self-serving, eroding any remaining goodwill and fueling a backlash that now seems entrenched.

The British public’s anger appears particularly acute this time. Polls and street-level sentiment suggest a growing fatigue with the Sussex drama. Many feel that Meghan’s repeated accusations portray the royal family as villains in a narrative where she casts herself as the perpetual victim.

“They left on their own terms, built a new life in California, and yet the attacks keep coming,” one royal watcher remarked.

“It’s hard not to see it as bitterness rather than bravery.” Others have drawn comparisons to historical royal ruptures, noting that while past exiles or abdications often faded into quiet retirement, the Sussexes have chosen a path of high-profile independence that keeps old wounds open.

Adding fuel to the fire are reports of the couple’s evolving plans for 2026. Speculation abounds that Meghan is preparing lifestyle-focused projects, including a potential cookbook and expanded branding efforts, while Prince Harry continues to advocate for security reforms that would facilitate more frequent UK visits.

Some analysts suggest the “plot” allegations may serve as a defensive posture, preempting criticism if any reconciliation efforts falter or if public reception in Britain remains hostile. One commentator warned that Meghan risks appearing “out of touch” with the prevailing mood, where sympathy for the couple has largely evaporated.

Yet not everyone dismisses the claims outright. A minority of voices, particularly among international audiences and progressive commentators, maintain that Meghan’s experiences highlight systemic issues within the monarchy, from media treatment of women of color to the pressures of royal life.

They point to the intense scrutiny she faced from the moment her relationship with Harry became public, arguing that some form of institutional resistance was inevitable.

As the dust settles on this latest outburst, the divide between the Sussexes and the royal family shows no signs of healing. For Meghan Markle, the allegations represent a stand for truth and self-preservation.

For much of the British public, they represent something else entirely: a refusal to move on, at the expense of an institution that has weathered centuries of change.

Whether these claims mark the final chapter or merely another installment remains unclear, but one thing is certain—the anger they have provoked is real, raw, and unlikely to fade anytime soon.

In a world where royalty once symbolized unity, the ongoing feud between Meghan Markle and the House of Windsor continues to expose fault lines that run deep.

As 2026 begins, the question lingers: can reconciliation ever be possible, or has the damage become irreparable? For now, the public watches, debates, and—above all—remains resolutely divided.

Meghan Markle has once again drawn criticism after reports emerged that she believed the British royal family was conspiring against her — a claim many members of the public have described as illogical and deeply frustrating.

According to the Daily Star, friends of the Duchess of Sussex revealed new details about Meghan’s time living within the royal household, suggesting she felt targeted and isolated after moving into Frogmore Cottage in Windsor.

These feelings, they claim, ultimately influenced her decision to leave the UK and relocate to the United States.

One friend alleged that shortly after settling into Frogmore Cottage, Meghan became convinced there was “some kind of plot” being directed against her within the royal system. As a result, she reportedly withdrew and began isolating herself.

“I think Meghan felt like an outsider from the very beginning,” the source said. “This wasn’t a life she was used to, and so she wanted to escape it.”

Another friend added that Meghan struggled with the loss of financial independence after marrying Prince Harry, claiming that royal life left her feeling “unfulfilled” and constrained.

Supporters of the Sussexes have also argued that life in the United States offered greater freedom from media intrusion. However, critics quickly challenged that narrative. Veteran American photographer Mark Karloff pointed out that Montecito is far from a haven of privacy.

“They live in an area that is a magnet for paparazzi,” Karloff said. “It’s almost laughable to suggest they can live a truly private life there. On any given day, there are around 20 photographers nearby, ready to capture celebrities.”

The renewed complaints have intensified public backlash, with many accusing Meghan of continuing to shift blame onto the royal family rather than acknowledging the responsibilities that come with marrying into the monarchy.

Critics argue that Meghan’s claim of being unwelcome from the outset is particularly unreasonable, noting that Queen Elizabeth II publicly extended warmth, privileges and unprecedented support to her new granddaughter-in-law.

In Britain especially, many feel that any woman marrying a prince would have understood that royal life involves duty, protocol and restraint — not personal reinvention on one’s own terms.

Instead, detractors say Meghan appeared determined to reshape royal rules to suit her preferences, generating repeated controversies before ultimately leaving the institution after just two years of marriage.

To an increasingly sceptical public, the idea of a hidden royal “plot” against Meghan is seen less as reality — and more as yet another attempt to recast herself as a victim of an institution she never truly intended to adapt to.