The dust has barely settled on Super Bowl LX, but the New England Patriots’ 13-29 loss to the Seattle Seahawks on February 8, 2026, at Levi’s Stadium continues to generate headlines far beyond the final score. What was already a disappointing end to a surprising 14-3 season for the Patriots has now escalated into a full-blown controversy surrounding officiating, with referee Brian Hartline at the center of the storm.

Hartline, the head official for the championship game, released a statement late on February 9 acknowledging errors in several pivotal calls after personally reviewing the game tape. “Upon thorough review of the footage, I am extremely regretful about certain decisions that impacted the flow and outcome of the game,” Hartline said in a prepared release distributed through NFL channels.
“I extend my sincere apologies to the New England Patriots organization, their players, coaches, and especially the fans who deserved better execution from the officiating crew.” The statement highlighted two specific plays: a questionable sideline catch awarded to Seattle’s Cooper Kupp early in the first quarter that extended a drive leading to Seattle’s opening field goal, and a missed unsportsmanlike conduct penalty in the fourth quarter involving Patriots wide receiver Stefon Diggs and Seahawks cornerback Josh Jobe, where Jobe appeared to throw punches that went unflagged.

The early Kupp “catch”—ruled a 23-yard completion despite replays showing incomplete possession and potential feet out of bounds—shifted early momentum decisively toward Seattle. Analysts noted that without the call, Seattle would have faced a longer field and possibly punted, altering the Seahawks’ 3-0 lead after the first quarter. The late-game scuffle, where Jobe took Diggs down out of bounds and responded with apparent blows to the helmet, drew particular ire. No flag was thrown, allowing Seattle to maintain possession and run clock in a game already slipping away from New England.

Patriots fans, already reeling from a defense that held them scoreless through three quarters and a young quarterback Drake Maye battling a pre-game shoulder injection, erupted online. Social media platforms flooded with clips, demands for reviews, and accusations of bias. The apology, while rare for an on-field official, was met with skepticism. Many viewed it as too little, too late, especially given the high stakes of the Super Bowl.
In response, the Patriots organization wasted no time. Eliot Wolf, serving in an executive football operations role (with owner Robert Kraft’s backing), formally submitted a complaint to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. The filing accuses Hartline and the crew of “demonstrable inconsistencies and potential bias” in key rulings, demanding a full independent investigation into the officiating process for Super Bowl LX. Sources close to the team indicate the complaint references prior games officiated by Hartline’s crew, including New England’s divisional-round win, where some perceived favorable calls, though no direct evidence of systemic favoritism has surfaced publicly.
The NFL, under pressure from widespread criticism, moved swiftly. On February 9, the league announced its first disciplinary measure: Hartline has been suspended from playoff assignments for the 2026 postseason (though the regular season is ongoing in hypothetical terms post-Super Bowl). Additionally, the officiating crew faces mandatory additional training and review sessions. While no fines or permanent bans were immediately detailed, league officials confirmed an internal audit of the game’s mechanics is underway, including consultation with the NFL’s Officiating Department and external replay experts.
The controversy adds another layer to what was already an emotionally charged defeat for the Patriots. Mike Vrabel, in his first season as head coach, guided the team from a dismal prior year to the Super Bowl, with Maye emerging as a star despite visible struggles. Post-game, Vrabel had expressed frustration with certain non-calls but focused on pride in the season.
“We got beat by a better team tonight in key moments,” he said, “but the effort was there.” The referee fallout has shifted some narrative toward external factors, though Seahawks supporters point out Seattle’s dominance—Kenneth Walker III’s MVP performance with 135 rushing yards and a stifling defense that sacked Maye six times—made the outcome inevitable regardless of flags.
For Patriots Nation, the apology and NFL’s initial response represent a partial victory in accountability, but many fans remain unsatisfied. Calls for more severe penalties, including potential rematches (though impossible) or commissioner interventions, persist. The incident echoes past Super Bowl officiating debates, from Super Bowl XL’s controversial flags against Seattle to other high-profile games where refs admitted post-game regrets.
As the offseason begins, the Patriots face key decisions: bolstering the offensive line for Maye’s protection, managing his shoulder health, and building depth. The referee saga may fuel motivation, turning frustration into resolve for a 2026-27 run. Meanwhile, the Seahawks celebrate their second title, with fans dismissing the noise as sour grapes from a beaten opponent.
Super Bowl LX will be remembered for Seattle’s triumph, Kenneth Walker’s heroics, and a young Patriots squad’s valiant effort. But the officiating controversy ensures the conversation lingers, reminding everyone that even in the NFL’s biggest game, human error can cast a long shadow. Whether this leads to broader reforms in officiating protocols remains to be seen, but for now, the Patriots’ pursuit of justice keeps the story alive in Foxborough.