Angela Levin’s explosive claims regarding Meghan Markle’s past have sent shockwaves through royal circles and media outlets worldwide. Known for her sharp insights into the lives of the British royal family, Levin has never been one to shy away from controversial opinions. But her latest revelation, as reported in the press, goes beyond simple criticism of the Duchess of Sussex—it exposes what Levin believes to be a calculated, power-driven agenda that Meghan has allegedly pursued from the very beginning of her royal journey.
According to Levin, Meghan Markle’s rise to prominence wasn’t solely aimed at Prince Harry, as many people have long believed. Instead, Levin suggests that Meghan’s initial target was none other than Prince William, the heir to the British throne. This bombshell claim paints a much different picture of Meghan’s ambition than the public has been led to believe for years. Rather than simply falling in love with Harry, Levin alleges that Meghan had a strategic interest in becoming part of the royal family through William—someone who, by birthright, holds the most power and influence in the royal lineage.
The idea that Meghan had set her sights on Prince William first is not only provocative, but it casts a new light on her early years in the public eye. For years, Meghan’s relationship with Harry was sold to the public as a love story, an almost fairy-tale romance that captivated millions around the globe. Their whirlwind courtship and eventual marriage seemed to fulfill the dream many people had for a modern-day Cinderella. But Levin’s latest revelations suggest that the reality of their relationship may be far from that fairy-tale image.
Levin’s assertion of Meghan’s alleged manipulation raises questions about the true nature of her ambitions. According to the biographer, Meghan entered the royal family with a clear agenda, seeking to secure not just a title or a life of luxury, but ultimate power. In Levin’s view, Meghan’s ambitions reached far beyond what she was given—suggesting that her discontent with royal life was driven by a desire for more.
According to Levin’s narrative, it wasn’t enough for Meghan to be a duchess; she craved the same level of influence and authority as the monarchy’s highest members, something she couldn’t attain with Harry alone.
At the heart of Levin’s commentary is the idea that Meghan’s behavior could be seen as ruthless, even selfish. Far from playing the role of a humble and gracious member of the royal family, Levin portrays Meghan as someone who believes that the world—and even the monarchy—should bend to her will. According to Levin’s depiction, Meghan’s expectations for her life as a royal were sky-high, and when those expectations weren’t met, she seemingly took matters into her own hands.
Rather than working within the traditional structures of the royal family, Meghan is said to have pursued a course of action that placed her firmly at odds with the monarchy’s established order.
But the tensions between Meghan and the royal family didn’t end with her departure from the U.K. and subsequent break with royal duties. Levin’s account suggests that Meghan’s dissatisfaction with her position was not just a result of institutional constraints, but a deeper sense of entitlement and an unwillingness to adapt. Levin claims that Meghan’s refusal to compromise or accept limitations led to her eventual disillusionment with the royal family—an institution that is, after all, built on centuries of tradition and hierarchy.
The contrast between Meghan and her sister-in-law, Kate Middleton, is another focal point of Levin’s criticism. While Meghan is painted as driven by personal ambition, Kate is portrayed as the opposite—someone who has navigated royal life with grace, humility, and a deep respect for her role within the family. In Levin’s view, Kate’s steady rise within the royal family is a testament to her commitment to her duties and her ability to balance personal aspirations with the responsibilities expected of her. Where Meghan has been seen as rebellious, Kate is seen as a paragon of royal etiquette.
But Levin’s narrative goes beyond merely comparing Meghan to Kate. She paints Meghan as someone who, in her pursuit of “everything,” may ultimately lose it all. The idea that Meghan could have everything handed to her and still not be satisfied with her position in life speaks to a deeper criticism of her character. In Levin’s eyes, Meghan’s behavior—her supposed manipulation, her sense of entitlement, and her unwillingness to accept the limitations that come with being part of the royal family—could lead to her downfall.
As Levin’s allegations circulate, they add fuel to the already fiery debate surrounding Meghan and Harry’s departure from royal life. For many, Meghan’s departure represented a break from the traditional monarchy and a rejection of the constraints placed on her by royal expectations. But for others, her departure signals something more troubling: an unwillingness to acknowledge the limitations of her position and a desire for even greater power and influence.
Levin’s revelation is sure to spark even more controversy, particularly given the backlash Meghan and Harry have faced from both the public and the media. Some will see Levin’s claims as a personal attack on Meghan, while others may view them as a necessary wake-up call regarding the true motivations behind the couple’s actions. Regardless of where one stands on the issue, there is no doubt that Levin’s comments have reignited the conversation about Meghan Markle’s role within the royal family—and her apparent unwillingness to settle for anything less than complete control.
For Meghan, the fallout from these revelations could be severe. The narrative of the “megalomaniacal duchess” who manipulated her way into the royal family could tarnish her public image in ways that will be difficult to undo. Her critics, already vocal in their disdain for her, will likely seize on Levin’s claims as further evidence of Meghan’s purported self-serving nature. On the other hand, her supporters may dismiss Levin’s assertions as simply another attempt to discredit Meghan and tarnish her reputation.
Regardless of which side of the debate one falls on, the reality remains that Meghan’s actions and words have placed her in the crosshairs of public scrutiny. Angela Levin’s explosive revelation serves as just the latest chapter in the ongoing saga of Meghan Markle’s life—one that continues to captivate, provoke, and divide.
In the end, the true story behind Meghan Markle’s rise to prominence may be far more complicated than anyone imagined. And as long as her past remains a source of intrigue and controversy, the royal family and the public will be left to ponder what lies beneath the surface of the Duchess of Sussex’s carefully curated persona.
